Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 05:34
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 1,008
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 122
Parallax 127
111% 128 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 86.6
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FP7002T 2TB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 522 449 447 418 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,676
Write 2,762
Mixed 1,948
SusWrite 460
387% 1,711 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 60.8
210% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 618
579% 914 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 207%
Great: 513%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$136
883GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 1468 1469 1496 1487 1481 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,358
Write 1,428
Mixed 1,481
SusWrite 1,463
376% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 77.7
266% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 1,098
DQ Mixed 1,211
910% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 320%
Great: 435%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
314GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 72.9
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 67.1
92% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
152% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 24.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 24.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2496 24E4
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 2,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback