Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 196 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 654 64% 523 Pts	64-Core 1,028 64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	55.2% Above average	Lighting 66.8 Reflection 71.6 Parallax 69.8 54% 69.4 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 71 Splatting 66.8 57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 M.2 NVMe SSD 240GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 234 160 160 153 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1,217 Write 427 Mixed 542 SusWrite 207 131% 599 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 54.2 174% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 529 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 206 209% 345 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 177%
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB 486 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 25GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 85 85 84 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 470 Write 241 Mixed 332 SusWrite 107 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 34.2 136% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 182 160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 85%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 113GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 574 539 503 456 362 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 764 Write 613 Mixed 468 SusWrite 488 131% 584 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 47.9 166% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 801 DQ Write 619 DQ Mixed 661 508% 694 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 254%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 70GB free Firmware: AM001K SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 101 102 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 101 63% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 206GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 129 129 128 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 168 Write 124 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 128 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 113%
I-O DATA HDC-U 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 112GB free, PID 010f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 103 Write 15.7 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 38.5 53% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 2x8GB 973 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 29.4 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.7 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	7%	14	204	32	60	21.5"	1280 720	DELA09E DELL E2214H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	44x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	20x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $60Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $523

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)