Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 654
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 69.8
54% 69.4 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 71
Splatting 66.8
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 M.2 NVMe SSD 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 234 160 160 153 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,217
Write 427
Mixed 542
SusWrite 207
131% 599 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 54.2
174% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 206
209% 345 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 134%
Great: 177%
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
25GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 85 85 84 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 470
Write 241
Mixed 332
SusWrite 107
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 34.2
136% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 182
160% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
113GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 574 539 503 456 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 764
Write 613
Mixed 468
SusWrite 488
131% 584 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 47.9
166% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 661
508% 694 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 143%
Great: 254%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
70GB free
Firmware: AM001K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 101 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 110
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 101
63% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
206GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 129 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 124
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 128
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 113%
I-O DATA HDC-U 320GB
112GB free, PID 010f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 103
Write 15.7
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 38.5
53% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 29.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 7% 14 204 32 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA09E DELL E2214H
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback