HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8977
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 07:56
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold 8505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 32.6
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 131
47% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 340
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8977) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 9.7
7% 9.4 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 9.8
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ9LQ128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS6NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 78 71 76 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 519
Write 129
Mixed 134
SusWrite 77.1
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 11.7
50% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 160
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 13
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 2.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 14" 1366 768 BOE090D
Typical ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback