HP 250 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BB8
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 13.5
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 99.2
33% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 221
25% 194 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BB8) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.2
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSELN128GA87MC0 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE4BP00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 607
Write 80
Mixed 406
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 21.5
65% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 184
164% 252 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN153B
Typical 250 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP 250 15.6 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback