Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$240
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 308
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 1227
109% 921 Pts
64-Core 2,171
134% 2,171 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 91
Parallax 84.8
76% 89.5 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 72.5
71% 88.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 460 479 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 493
Mixed 437
SusWrite 481
108% 482 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54
189% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 125%
Great: 128%
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1745 1451 760 765 756 778 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1606
Write 1,775
Mixed 1,502
SusWrite 1,042
334% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 78.2
273% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,336
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1147
867% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 265%
Great: 283%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
571GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 417 435 426 426 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 479
Mixed 373
SusWrite 431
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 51.3
163% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 235
208% 312 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 117%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2499 839 816 808 797 837 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 3,958
Mixed 2,505
SusWrite 1,099
544% 2,399 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 85.6
303% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,172
866% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 293%
Great: 517%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
59GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 490 490 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 494
Mixed 400
SusWrite 489
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 62.8
211% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Micron CT4000X 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 420 149 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 297
Write 317
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 190
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 4
53% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 27.9
23% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOy CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 85.6
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 42.6
160% 55.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 145%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 IVM7607 PL3270Q
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback