Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory50GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 50GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory43.3 GB free of 50 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 12:08
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 83.1
34% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 290
26% 218 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A2
Nvidia(10DE 157E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1770 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 537.70
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 41.4
40% 42.8 fps
MRender 57.9
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 33.5
33% 42.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 537GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 1015 1022 1010 1074 1032 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 57.4
MC Mixed 55.5
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 19.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 127%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 5 64 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback