Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230324
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 20:08
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 42.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 118
42% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 319
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 10.6
5% 9.43 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 5.6
5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 425 413 420 403 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 483
Write 433
Mixed 452
SusWrite 373
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 28.2
90% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 282
208% 284 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0C02
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback