QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.6 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 10:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 211
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 604
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-6Q
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 966GB
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 170 200 192 198 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 414
Write 408
Mixed 342
SusWrite 189
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 21.4
54% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 101
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33.2
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback