Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX507ZM
Memory	16 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230503
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700H 52,857 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 62 1-Core 115 2-Core 207 70% 128 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 554 55% 451 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 1CBC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.1% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 122 Parallax 120 103% 123 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 99.5 Splatting 86.4 86% 109 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB 3,489 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 158 2.4 3.4 171 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 342 Write 571 Mixed 316 SusWrite 93.4 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 9.5 28% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 289%
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 182GB free Firmware: P1MA0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 964 963 600 415 420 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 700 Write 629 Mixed 675 SusWrite 724 154% 682 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 46 140% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 732 DQ Mixed 628 467% 608 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 188%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-4800S3434A162x16GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 46.5 MC Mixed 45.6 131% 45.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 20.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	7	189	7	170	31.5"	2560 1369	AUS32B8 VG32AQA1A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	11x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	5x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	1x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 208%, 3,489 samples	5x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	3x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	2x

RAM
Skill Intl F5-4800S3434A162x16GBGBench 141%, 185 samples	6x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	6x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GBMicronBench 120%, 12,360 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16