Lenovo 21H5S00600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 21H5S00600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21H5S00600
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 01:14
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 305
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 893
91% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,186
73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50BF) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.40.72
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 35.8
20% 26.2 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 22.5
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-256G-1201 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,544
Write 1,644
Mixed 1,513
420% 1,900 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 62.9
225% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 615
481% 677 MB/s
Poor: 97% Great: 292%
SDHC 16GB
10GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 44.5
Write 18.9
Mixed 13.7
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.8
697% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 24.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback