Today's hottest deals

Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 01:08
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 103
51% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3662) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 40.4
26% 35 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 28
28% 35 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 369
Write 269
Mixed 295
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 30.9
112% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 68.2
DQ Mixed 52.3
53% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Corsair CMV8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.1
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback