Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U Graphics 481 User benchmarks, average bench 65% FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 117 44% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 297 33% 260 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 10,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Legend(17AA 50B1) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.44.50 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 15 4% 9.5 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 12.7 Splatting 15.5 10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MKP1MDQ 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.2Q06A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 718 712 552 345 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Read 726 Write 786 Mixed 642 SusWrite 549 152% 676 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 16.3 73% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 374 272% 354 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 211%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB 7,899 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	5	104	29	0	14"	1280 720	LEN4169

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 3 5425U GraphicsAMDBench 65%, 481 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 10,863 samples	1x

SSD
RPJTJ256MKP1MDQ 256GBUmisBench 157%, 25 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 7,899 samples	1x