Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 275
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 873
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$501
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 259
Parallax 308
229% 283 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 229
Splatting 173
189% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2744 3159 1570 1633 1637 1711 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,779
Write 4,243
Mixed 3,183
SusWrite 2,076
695% 3,070 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 93.1
317% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 1,108
814% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 383%
Great: 507%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
689GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 420 425 421 424 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 417
Mixed 276
SusWrite 426
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 24
142% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 265
225% 328 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 103%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 30.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 0P 5R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 50% 26 216 56 60 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM0E3C U32H85x
History: Score 37: 0P 5R 2G 6B | Score 39: 0P 5R 3G 5B
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback