bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '18 at 23:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 682
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K260Q
Nvidia(10DE 101B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.71
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 20
17% 22.1 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 23.4
20% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
99GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 34GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 89%
Vmware Virtual disk 140GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 383
Write 272
Mixed 363
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 7.22
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 7.7
25% 7.81 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 109
111% 180 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 64 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 17.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback