Lenovo 21HFCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 21HFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21HFCTO1WW
Memory39.7 GB free of 48 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1370P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 200
2-Core 352
111% 209 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 580
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 230E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 24.9
11% 22.1 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 19.6
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HDLB-00BLL 2TB
488GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L2QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 1111 1274 1065 1046 1047 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 1,272
Mixed 1713
SusWrite 1,099
307% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 74.4
234% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 414
294% 380 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 211%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4DB0-CWMOL Hynix HMCG88AGBSA092N 47GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 52.7
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 31.7
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 122%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 14" 1280 720 LEN403A
Typical 21HFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 21HFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback