Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime22.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 05:10
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$262
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,092
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 2,101
130% 2,101 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 85.2
75% 89.5 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.5
71% 89.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 463 462 469 467 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 462
Mixed 350
SusWrite 465
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 47.3
170% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 298
241% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LH960HAJR-000AZ 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: HXT73W3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 493 493 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 494
Mixed 424
SusWrite 492
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.5
186% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4725 4855 4850 4848 4176 3637 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
564% Outstanding
Read 2,877
Write 4,697
Mixed 3,182
SusWrite 4,515
868% 3,818 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 111
379% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,493
DQ Write 1,025
DQ Mixed 1,286
952% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 564%
Great: 604%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 31.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $756
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback