Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 252%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 327%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive511% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 22:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$398
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 234
2-Core 469
132% 261 Pts
4-Core 941
8-Core 1,840
165% 1,390 Pts
64-Core 3,887
241% 3,887 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 274
Parallax 328
239% 299 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 249
Splatting 195
213% 272 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 205%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3417 3447 3445 3464 3462 3472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
511% Outstanding
Read 2,639
Write 3,254
Mixed 2,957
SusWrite 3,451
697% 3,075 MB/s
4K Read 82.7
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 124
408% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,713
DQ Write 1,330
DQ Mixed 1,507
1,131% 1,517 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 511%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2E6000C36 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 34" 1280 720 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback