Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141029
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 19:10
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 115 56% 88.2 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 310 33% 263 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 164 Parallax 160 122% 158 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 157 Splatting 113 106% 131 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 131 130 132 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 191 Write 158 Mixed 155 SusWrite 123 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 19.1 64% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 61.6 55% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 51%
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 16GB free Firmware: AXM07H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 60 62 71 78 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 56.2 Write 178 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 75.8 22% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 13 51% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 25.7 DQ Mixed 15.2 26% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLE4G3D1869DE Kingmax FLJF66F-D8KMB BLE4G3D1869DE Kingmax FLJF66F-D8KMB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 667, 800, 667, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.2% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 17.6 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	21.5"	1280 720	BNQ785F G2420HDBL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	185x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	81x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	57x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	45x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16