Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS76 Stealth 11UG
MotherboardMSI MS-17M1  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 06:44
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 156
2-Core 278
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 799
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,111
69% 1,111 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 10.7
7% 11.8 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 9.8
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1905 2014 1942 1799 1516 1208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 3,095
Write 1254
Mixed 1361
SusWrite 1,731
412% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 44.7
198% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 663
466% 602 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 314%
Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 30.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 16.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 17% 59 218 60 240 17.2" 1707 960 BOE09F9
Typical MS-17M1 Builds (Compare 915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback