Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive521% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Creator Z16 A12UET
MotherboardMSI MS-1572  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 162
2-Core 335
99% 190 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 898
91% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1345) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1109
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 30.1
20% 28.3 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 1
10% 13.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2162 3453 3482 3000 3556 3555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
521% Outstanding
Read 3,976
Write 4322
Mixed 2,615
SusWrite 3,202
794% 3,529 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 103
350% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,767
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 1,230
930% 1,274 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 521%
Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 45.7
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 16" 1280 720 AUOBF99
Typical MS-1572 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback