Gigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 275
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 30.3
17% 25.9 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Etopso 128GB 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 96 95 101 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 372
Write 311
Mixed 260
SusWrite 97.2
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 9.9
70% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 14
23% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
370GB free
Firmware: LVD6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 97 95 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.2
Mixed 60
SusWrite 98.3
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2
370% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 70.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 70.3
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 50%
WDC WD16 00BEKT-75A25T0 160GB
48GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 52.2
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 51.6
68% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 40" 1280 720 SKY0104 TV-monitor
Typical GA-PH67A-D3-B3 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-PH67A-D3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback