Asus Q87T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Q87T  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 22:52
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 172
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 245
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3960
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 491
Write 340
Mixed 286
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 24.1
111% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 86.5
107% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 126%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
997GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.9
Mixed 17.3
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.21
57% 0.71 MB/s
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB
243GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 21.4
Mixed 8.71
22% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.71 MB/s
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
194GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 21.4
Mixed 14.5
25% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.22
58% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 46%
WDC WD20 EVDS-63T3B0 2TB
37GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 21.1
Mixed 15.2
25% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 20
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87T Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q87T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $75
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback