Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z690-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P  (all builds)
Memory117.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 21:01
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$245
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 62.5
1-Core 204
2-Core 380
110% 215 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,242
116% 964 Pts
64-Core 2,926
181% 2,926 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 124%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
941GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1209 1214 1258 1307 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,597
Write 3,072
Mixed 2,776
SusWrite 1,250
546% 2,424 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 103
339% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,487
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,275
958% 1,287 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 343%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
475GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,411
Write 2207
Mixed 1,857
481% 2,158 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 81.8
274% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 1099
841% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 399%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$78
465GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,785
Write 1,723
Mixed 1,365
362% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 65.2
226% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,444
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 1,156
873% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 32.2
Mixed 21.4
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 89.8
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.3
1,224% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
AI Mass Storage 2GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.2
Write 10
Mixed 7.3
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBUA081N 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 40.4
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 5% 20 30 10 64 0" 1920 1009
History: Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B | Score 21: 0P 2R 2G 5B
Typical PRIME Z690-P Builds (Compare 3,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $850
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback