Today's hottest deals

Alienware X51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware X51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 06G6JW
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 09:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 169
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 273
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 57 9.3 4.4 38 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 222
Write 184
Mixed 180
SusWrite 58.2
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 12.3
46% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 32.5
41% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 60%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 18 15 18 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 61.3
Write 20.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 16.5
34% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 3.7
163% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 0 0" 1280 720
Typical X51 Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Alienware X51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback