Asrock Q270 Pro BTC+

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Q270 Pro BTC+ (all builds)
Memory	53.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210707
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '23 at 04:49
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$148 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 197 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 492 53% 421 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 8338) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.2% Poor	Lighting 29.4 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 31.6 24% 31.9 fps	MRender 31.8 Gravity 29.3 Splatting 20.7 22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 130GB free Firmware: MAV01H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 328 326 326 325 325 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 427 Mixed 366 SusWrite 329 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 43.4 142% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 349 261% 348 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 122%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 465GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0915A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 4.7 52 58 58 57 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 1% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$56 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 198 200 199 198 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 155 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 197 116% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/32GX 2x31.5GB 3,531 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 21.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	52	24	100	34"	2752 1129	XMI3445 Mi Monitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q270 Pro BTC+ Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 70%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Q270 Pro BTC+

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	10x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	8x
Core i7-7700Intel $148Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $260Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	6x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $500Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	4x
RTX 2060Nvidia $234Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $24Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $44Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
IRX2666D464L16S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 2,100 samples	3x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 22 samples	3x
Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 4,553 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $454

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $83
Intel Core i5-13600K $200	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393