Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N95 1,411 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 32.1 1-Core 81.3 2-Core 143 45% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 245 32% 244 Pts	64-Core 250 15% 250 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 811 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5084 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 3.7 4% 4.93 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 5 Splatting 0.7 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 6,980 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEB2.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 35 30 49 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 302 Write 105 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 32.9 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 2.6 29% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4x3GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 8 slots used 12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 250 16% 250 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	81	57	60	26"	1280 720	SPT0FD8 E40

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	289x
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples	67x
Core i7-10810UIntelBench 70%, 612 samples	62x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	300x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples	77x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	67x