Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 152
56% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 226
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.5
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13821
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 400 401 393 392 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 424
Mixed 405
SusWrite 400
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 40.3
145% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 263
194% 251 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 244%
Kingston SA400S37240G 512GB
254GB free
Firmware: HP3618B7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 400 407 373 173 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 457
Write 412
Mixed 372
SusWrite 296
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 11.8
96% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 16.5
62% 135 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN8GB2666MHZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (86th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM56F0 W2353
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback