Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 113% UFO	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	359% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	113.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231013
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$368 2,433 User benchmarks, average bench 113% AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Memory 71.1 1-Core 210 2-Core 416 118% 232 Pts	4-Core 819 8-Core 1,570 142% 1,195 Pts	64-Core 2,830 175% 2,830 Pts
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 42.6 Parallax 40 37% 42.5 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 28.3 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 2111 1937 1970 2007 2015 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	359% Outstanding	Read 2,539 Write 2,209 Mixed 1,417 SusWrite 2,040 460% 2,051 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 70.9 234% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 1,465 DQ Write 1,262 DQ Mixed 1,410 1,044% 1,379 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 359% Great: 393%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$110 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 37GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 191 82 83 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 482 Mixed 415 SusWrite 168 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 74.7 4K Mixed 48.2 154% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 128%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 157GB free Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 2069 367 369 372 363 2018 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 1,860 Write 2,277 Mixed 1,959 SusWrite 926 396% 1,756 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 67.1 218% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,967 DQ Write 1,480 DQ Mixed 1,704 1,280% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 394%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 566GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 111 113 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 123 Write 103 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 112 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 693GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 160 156 156 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 163 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 158 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 439GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 99 101 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 121 Write 94 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 101 125% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 61%
hp v285w 32GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 27GB free, PID 1a40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.6 6.7 6.5 7 7.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 105 Write 7.5 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 6.9 28% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 57% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B5200C40 4x31.8GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	117% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 38.8 MC Mixed 41.4 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 38.3 SC Write 45.3 SC Mixed 41.2 119% 41.6 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 168%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 413%

UFO

Desktop 118%

UFO

Workstation 419%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD $476Bench 117%, 6,945 samples	53x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD $265Bench 112%, 3,546 samples	35x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD $368Bench 113%, 2,433 samples	23x

GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,802Bench 370%, 37,290 samples	12x
RTX 4080Nvidia $993Bench 290%, 22,998 samples	11x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $740Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	11x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	19x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $110Bench 338%, 78,573 samples	11x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GBKingston $90Bench 180%, 16,861 samples	14x
TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GBG.SKILL $83Bench 168%, 31,229 samples	13x
Skill Intl F5-6000J3038F162x16GBGBench 187%, 6,984 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $2,476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350