Today's hottest deals

MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI6 (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star US Desktop Aegis ZS
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI6 (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 05:41
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 999
94% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,405
87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 122
Parallax 127
111% 129 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 422 432 437 426 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 436
Mixed 395
SusWrite 430
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 51.5
171% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 277
215% 295 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
228GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 305 306 306 306 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 471
Mixed 417
SusWrite 324
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.1
197% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
357GB free
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 997 996 996 997 997 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1971
Write 2,277
Mixed 1,696
SusWrite 1,055
394% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 68.1
238% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 996
748% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 262%
Great: 297%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 574 565 574 543 562 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 2,113
Mixed 1,867
SusWrite 710
377% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 77.7
270% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1361
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1,186
897% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 262%
Great: 300%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$61
959GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 156 153 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 166
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$54
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 23.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 5R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7750 LG HDR 4K
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI6 (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI6 (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback