Average Bench: 84.6% (34th of 635)

Based on 628 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 731F Model: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

The 6GB AMD 5600 XT is a slightly cheaper, BIOS restricted, version of the 8GB 5700. The majority of 5600 XT’s should operate reasonably quietly as the single fan reference design was skipped for this release. Although the reference design is absent there are, however, several variants which range in performance between the GTX 1660S and the RTX 2060. Performance is more varied than usual because of last minute BIOS changes. The best versions of the 5600 XT (Sapphire Pulse) were distributed to reviewers (good luck finding one of these at MSRP). These models are capable, with BIOS updates, of performance that almost matches the RTX 2060. At $280 USD the higher performing SKUs could make sense for users that are happy to tinker with or return faulty hardware. During our GTAV testing reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appears on several Navi and Vega cards). Whilst playing Project Cars 2 our 5600 XT PC crashed several times. Given the vast number of software (and hardware) problems since day one of the 5000 series launch, it’s ironic that AMD’s latest 20.1.3 driver does not even offer an option to skip the installation of a boatload of new system shortcuts, gimmicks and other bloatware. [Jan '20 GPUPro]


Very good average bench

The AMD RX 5600-XT averaged just 15.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX 5600-XT near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 323fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 318fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX 5600-XT is just 12.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX 5600-XT performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 250fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 634fps

Average Bench

(Based on 628 samples)
Min Avg Max
239 Lighting 323 364
197 Reflection 250 270
574 Parallax 634 700
84.9% 402 fps
Min Avg Max
182 MRender 194 207
291 Gravity 318 338
280 Splatting 305 323
85% 272 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Lighting 364
Reflection 264
Parallax 705
96% 444 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 333
Splatting 321
89% 285 fps
Lighting 354
Reflection 263
Parallax 691
93% 436 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 327
Splatting 314
88% 281 fps
Lighting 339
Reflection 251
Parallax 605
89% 398 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 315
Splatting 301
84% 269 fps
Lighting 320
Reflection 239
Parallax 604
84% 388 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 301
Splatting 286
80% 256 fps
628 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 24,648,651 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 628 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $290 @ launch in Jan '20)
Sapphire(1DA2 E411) 44% 86% ± 4%
Sapphire RX 5600 XT 6GB Pulse
EbayUS $3309 mins
PowerColor(148C 2402) 17% 84% ± 4%
PowerColor RX 5600 XT 6GB Red Devil
AmazonUS $3204 mins
Gigabyte(1458 231C) 14% 84% ± 4%
Gigabyte RX 5600 XT 6GB Gaming OC
AmazonUS $3004 mins
XFX(1682 5710) 13% 83% ± 4%
XFX RX 5600 XT 6GB Thicc II PRO
AmazonUS $3004 mins
EbayUS $3049 mins
MSI(1462 381E) 4% 83% ± 4%
ASRock(1849 5120) 2% 82% ± 3%
Asus(1043 059D) 1% 83% ± 3%
Asus(1043 04E8) 1% 86% ± 4%
Gigabyte(1458 231D) 1% 80% ± 2%
ASRock(1849 5121) 0% 82% ± 1%
MSI(1462 C810) 0% 83% ± 7%
ASRock(1849 5122) 0% 82% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX 5600-XT Builds (Compare 15,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 72%

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $745

Popular RX 5600-XT compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added 29 days ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

2 days ago.

Pro gamers avoid AMD for a reason... A bus company with drunk drivers can’t win real users with cheerleaders and cheap marketing stunts.


9 days ago.

Pro gamers avoid AMD for a reason... A bus company with drunk drivers can’t win real users with cheerleaders and cheap marketing stunts.


6 days ago.

Pro gamers avoid AMD for a reason... A bus company with drunk drivers can’t win real users with cheerleaders and cheap marketing stunts.


2 days ago.

right now it to high of price in Canada and it also most cost 500$ right now so i would wait and buy something else or buy used for now and wait for the dollar to come back up a bit then you should buy it in my opinion


3 days ago.



17 days ago.

me like it, more bang for ur buck


11 days ago.

I had 1070 now games run at least 10 fps higher.


19 days ago.


It's a 5700 with a starved memory bus for not much cheaper.—Jan '20


26 days ago.

A solid entry in the midrange arena. Still think the price needs to come down though.


22 days ago.


28 days ago.

A good mid-range GPU, equivalent in performance to the 2060, which Nvidia put down to 300 MSRP with the KO version. If the 5600 XT stays at 279 MSRP, the 2060 KO only edges it with lower consumption and RTX.


28 days ago.

Released 21st January 2020, this sub-300 GPU is aimed for 144fps+ 1080p gaming or 75fps 1440p gaming at that price. After you bought this card, make sure that you do VBIOS flash to gain 10% additional performance.


24 days ago.

Pretty epic for the price.

635 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback