Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 21:49
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 430
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 35.5
22% 30.9 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 20.7
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256F 251GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM8JA1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 964
Write 688
Mixed 446
154% 699 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 33.5
114% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 190
183% 295 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x394A53463531323732415A2D314739453220 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 19% 54 192 23 60 31.6" 1280 720 HPN365A HP 32f
Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback