Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 512
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.33
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 36
25% 31.3 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 32
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
461GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 355 343 288 276 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 430
Write 373
Mixed 327
SusWrite 320
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 29.3
98% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 165
124% 167 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31384A534631473732415A2D314739453220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 39.3
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback