Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory92 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231023
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 20 '24 at 08:37
Run Duration493 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 155
2-Core 278
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 769
80% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 227
Parallax 525
188% 328 fps
MRender 368
Gravity 195
Splatting 308
238% 290 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 184%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1492 1483 1558 1497 1539 1516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1,574
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 1514
372% 1,652 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 45
127% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 345
322% 479 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 229%
Great: 508%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 273 375 427 370 327 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 43% Great: 87%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
662GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 330 302 313 352 358 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 132%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 319 336 329 326 351 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 557 1356 1670 1747 1728 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
912GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1483 1639 1511 1197 1182 1183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,891
Write 1,716
Mixed 1,297
SusWrite 1,366
352% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 51.5
162% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 559
454% 628 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 239%
Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
820GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 463 502 480 472 487 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 192 218 203 205 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 90%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$65
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 131 148 141 147 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 142
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 134 127 132 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 73.1
Write 125
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 127
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 90%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 222 223 225 222 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 233
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 222
138% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.7
354% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%
HPE RDX 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 107 123 115 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 116
129% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 36.7
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 2560 1369 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback