Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 09:43
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 164
2-Core 318
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 1,043
101% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 176
Parallax 163
138% 170 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APJ13PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 412 7.4 7.8 182 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 456
Mixed 385
SusWrite 251
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 42.2
157% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 201
180% 269 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 95%
PNY 1TB SATA SSD 1TB
585GB free
Firmware: H221215a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 443 446 451 445 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 476
Mixed 436
SusWrite 452
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.1
151% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 253
190% 250 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB
315GB free
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1307 1311 1371 1380 1361 1348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,173
SusWrite 1,346
309% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 61.4
214% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 931
694% 909 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 252%
Great: 259%
PNY CS2241 1TB SSD
225GB free
Firmware: CS224C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 100 92 183 85 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 3,336
Mixed 2,331
SusWrite 251
439% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 85.7
317% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,299
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 1,149
839% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 235%
Great: 446%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 155 153 159 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 129
Write 149
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 154
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 34.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 35.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 2G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 218 60 60 23.8" 1920 1080 SAM71A8 S24R35xFZ
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback