Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NS
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 00:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 169
2-Core 336
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,084
105% 861 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600S
Asus(1043 231D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.4% Good
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 113
54% 95.7 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 134
97% 117 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 1463 1660 2191 2180 2146 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,846
Write 2,244
Mixed 1,937
SusWrite 1,836
496% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 58.3
208% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 872
610% 789 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 323%
Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 38.9
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 29.9
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 16" 1536 889 CMN1624 N160JME_GE1
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback