AZW MINI S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemAZW MINI S  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW MINI S
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 03:16
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 346
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3417
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 5.7
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb SSD 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12221
SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 651 636 608 609 625 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 689
Write 670
Mixed 649
SusWrite 632
149% 660 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 70.6
236% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 895
634% 804 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 173%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 15 60 19.5" 1280 720 SPT080D Sceptre J20
Typical MINI S Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AZW MINI S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback