Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N100 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 23 1-Core 89 2-Core 122 42% 78 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 240 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1E50 8023) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.93 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 5 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Airdisk 512GB SSD 512GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN14546 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 350 350 381 407 389 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 327 Write 353 Mixed 329 SusWrite 375 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 29.3 111% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 268 196% 253 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 268%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4x3GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 8 slots used 12GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 23.5 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	0"	1280 1000	XXX0000 FullHD TV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	50x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	19x

SSD
512GB SSD 512GBAirdiskBench 194%, 214 samples	40x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	17x
SU650NS38 512GBAdataBench 89%, 72 samples	6x

RAM
4x3GBMicronBench 64%, 85 samples	31x
4x3GBSamsungBench 60%, 108 samples	19x
NS04GS4E4 2x4GBUnknownBench 64%, 14 samples	7x