HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C30
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 09:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 155
57% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 536
48% 408 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8C30) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.60.07
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 23
Parallax 24.7
12% 20.6 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 20.2
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 862 917 949 1126 995 899 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,518
Write 1,252
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 958
282% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 35
130% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 415
285% 362 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 174%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 17.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 14% 69 210 56 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 15-fb1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback