Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.37% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '24 at 14:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 63.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 852
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 2304) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 69.1
36% 57.4 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 43.3
42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 22 16 14 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 150
Write 374
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 19.8
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
4% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 247%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 179 179 175 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 114 51 12 77 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 4.5
Write 10.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 70.1
35% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG16GX4M1D3600C18 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA16C DELL S2421HGF
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback