Today's hottest deals

Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$100
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 372
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Asus(1043 895E) ≥ 4GB; DUAL-RTX4060-O8G-EVO
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 112
Parallax 149
130% 140 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 126
Splatting 101
114% 145 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 367 433 445 436 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 462
Mixed 355
SusWrite 401
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 42.3
151% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 292
236% 334 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 137%
WDC WD60EMAZ-11LW3B0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 141 139 139 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 117
SusWrite 138
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 4.33 MB/s
WDC WD60EZAX-00C8VB0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 174 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 190
Write 174
Mixed 161
SusWrite 172
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3.4
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 3.1
3% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0496 R271
Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 3,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $732
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback