Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 03:52
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$397
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 178
2-Core 337
111% 204 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,178
108% 907 Pts
64-Core 1,744
108% 1,744 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 247
Parallax 483
192% 322 fps
MRender 396
Gravity 206
Splatting 323
252% 308 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 190%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41061C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,557
Write 2,463
Mixed 1,682
497% 2,234 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 68.7
227% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,258
DQ Mixed 1,407
1,064% 1,437 MB/s
Poor: 181% Great: 414%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
422GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3159 3150 1589 291 263 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 3,546
Write 3,291
Mixed 2,657
SusWrite 1,453
613% 2,737 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 61
217% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 2,045
DQ Write 1,669
DQ Mixed 1,739
1,334% 1,817 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 380%
Great: 633%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$330
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 488 484 488 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 488
Mixed 457
SusWrite 487
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 176 176 176 172 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
93GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 52.3
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 49.8
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 85.9
MC Write 73.2
MC Mixed 80.9
228% 80 GB/s
SC Read 67.6
SC Write 66.8
SC Mixed 68.8
194% 67.7 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06C1 XV272U
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback