Gigabyte GA-A620M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '24 at 19:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 181
2-Core 342
104% 199 Pts
4-Core 708
8-Core 1,097
111% 902 Pts
64-Core 1,327
82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$388
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 197
Parallax 215
174% 208 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
154% 198 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2458 1893 1838 1843 1870 1847 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,654
Write 2,788
Mixed 2,625
SusWrite 1,958
565% 2,506 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 60.2
192% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,666
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,287
965% 1,306 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 344%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
145% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 51.2
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 45.9
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 49.5
142% 49.8 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 145%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 60 21.5" 1920 1009 SAM0B3B S22D300
Typical GA-A620M DS3H Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $877
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback