Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NT
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 04:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 170
2-Core 327
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,145
105% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700S
Asus(1043 1513) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 175
Parallax 247
112% 186 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 164
Splatting 198
159% 194 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2031 2122 2102 2211 2070 1213 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,855
Write 2,262
Mixed 2,007
SusWrite 1,958
509% 2,270 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 57.9
205% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 885
613% 784 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 330%
Great: 465%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 49.5
MC Mixed 39
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 30.5
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 0G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 13% 69 208 56 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NT_FA617NT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback