Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO690
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 204
2-Core 368
112% 215 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,223
115% 956 Pts
64-Core 2,820
174% 2,820 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5244
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (240 fps cap detected)
172% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 240
Parallax 240
196% 240 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 236
Splatting 188
178% 222 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 172%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2808 1772 1804 1742 1445 1011 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,496
Write 2,919
Mixed 2671
SusWrite 1,764
556% 2,462 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 85
275% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,146
DQ Mixed 1,315
989% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 353%
Great: 444%
Nvme CA6 -8D1024 1TB
569GB free
Firmware: 3106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 765 769 742 669 655 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
Read 681
Write 210
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 668
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 36.9
119% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 183
146% 202 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB-$290
1TB free
Firmware: 624331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3983 3618 3617 3839 4253 4196 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
563% Outstanding
Read 3,831
Write 4,118
Mixed 3,165
SusWrite 3,918
848% 3,758 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 84.7
301% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,973
DQ Write 1,567
DQ Mixed 1,708
1,295% 1,749 MB/s
Poor: 288%
This bench: 563%
Great: 683%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G56C46S5.C16D 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 52.5
161% 56.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 25.2
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 143%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 18 144 16" 1280 720 TMX0005 TL160ADMP04-0
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback