Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 270
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 647
70% 556 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2017) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.4% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.9
79% 98.6 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 73.4
71% 89.7 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
624GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2277 1990 1453 1614 1538 1595 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 3,602
Write 3,641
Mixed 2,752
SusWrite 1,744
658% 2,935 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 78
274% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 643
509% 715 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 369%
Great: 666%
Nvme CA6 -8D1024 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 796 797 789 806 799 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
115% Outstanding
Read 367
Write 596
Mixed 440
SusWrite 796
125% 550 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 40.2
132% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 250
182% 236 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 30.3
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 15.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 3R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 30% 37 297 195 60 27" 3072 1728 GSM5B80 LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B | Score 29: 0P 3R 3G 5B
Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback