Asus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 11:20
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$320
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 78.6
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,669
149% 1,262 Pts
64-Core 3,047
189% 3,047 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 F475) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 260
Parallax 464
186% 317 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 262
Splatting 266
214% 260 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 176%
Great: 176%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2479 2195 1851 1845 1830 1797 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 2,526
Write 2,529
Mixed 2379
SusWrite 1,999
531% 2,358 MB/s
4K Read 74.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 111
363% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,886
DQ Write 1,554
DQ Mixed 1,725
1,290% 1,722 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 413%
Great: 508%
Acer FA100 2TB
709GB free
Firmware: 1.Z.J.2X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2321 2324 2139 2310 2251 2191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 1274
Write 2374
Mixed 1454
SusWrite 2,256
419% 1,839 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 77.4
338% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1455
DQ Write 1,103
DQ Mixed 218
451% 925 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 347%
Great: 345%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1087
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 1392 1397 1433 1430 1429 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 1TB
607GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 153 153 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
Read 226
Write 25.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 156
140% 121 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
57% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 67
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 60
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 30.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 160%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 199 32 165 31.5" 2048 1152 MSI4DB9 MSI G321Q
Typical ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 1,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback