Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 42.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 264
76% 149 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 802
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 23
13% 17.1 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 19.2
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 370 52 39 35 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1500
Write 1,732
Mixed 1,427
SusWrite 114
268% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 40.9
131% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 528
392% 524 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 131%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4161CAB2F1HB2 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 0R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 8% 120 38 22 75 23.8" 1920 1009 PHLC212 PHL 241V8
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback