Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 269%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 327%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory110.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '24 at 23:22
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$394
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 73
1-Core 214
2-Core 419
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 810
8-Core 1,576
141% 1,193 Pts
64-Core 2,869
178% 2,869 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$769
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 362
Reflection 357
Parallax 424
295% 381 fps
MRender 475
Gravity 293
Splatting 227
259% 332 fps
Poor: 229%
This bench: 247%
Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,162
Write 1,185
Mixed 1,092
256% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.6
209% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,344
DQ Mixed 1,489
1,090% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Team T253A3002T 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 441 448 445 448 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 440
Mixed 393
SusWrite 447
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 21.6
124% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 32.9
88% 180 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 102%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4048 4062 4047 3931 3858 3911 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 1,963
Write 4,151
Mixed 2,464
SusWrite 3,976
716% 3,139 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 75.7
255% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2007
DQ Write 1,417
DQ Mixed 1,808
1,324% 1,744 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 476%
Great: 530%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 4500
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.6 7.5 8.5 7.6 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 7.8
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
119% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 41.9
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 46.6
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 43.2
129% 45.1 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 119%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 27" 1280 720 ACR072E EI272UR
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $2,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback