Today's hottest deals

Machenike L16A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMachenike L16A  (all builds)
MotherboardMachenike L16A
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '24 at 13:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 39
1-Core 126
2-Core 268
72% 144 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 798
74% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8018) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.26
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 56.3
26% 43.8 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 42.8
28% 32.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SCY S5000 512G 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.F.F.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2397 2506 2516 2601 1457 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,477
Write 2,604
Mixed 2,046
SusWrite 1,992
514% 2,280 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 65.1
240% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 290
341% 587 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 327%
Great: 327%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 31.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 16" 1280 720 BOE09B6
Typical L16A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Machenike L16A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback