Today's hottest deals

HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 881D
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 12:51
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 232
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 348
40% 312 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 881D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 9.8
6% 9.33 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.1
7% 9.13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN580 500GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 745 753 998 1038 1076 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,810
Write 1,184
Mixed 1,152
SusWrite 883
280% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 51.5
214% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 307
265% 405 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 211%
Great: 501%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO3691
Typical 250 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback